Eight Years and an Examination in Hungarian for Everyone Else, Nothing but Language and a Clean Record for a Descendant - and Since the 2025 Amendment a Dual National's Hungarian Citizenship Can Be Suspended for Ten Years
Answer
The general rule applies to you
No exception is recorded for citizens of Guatemala on this topic. That is the answer, not a gap - everything below is the rule you get, unchanged.
172 exceptions recorded across 63 countries · none match Guatemala to Hungary · Becoming a citizen
Ordinary naturalisation under section 4(1) of Act LV of 1993 asks for eight continuous years of residence in Hungary, a clean Hungarian record with no prosecution pending, secured livelihood and housing, no public or national security objection, and a passed examination in constitutional basic knowledge taken in Hungarian. Section 4/A(2) exempts from that examination a person of limited capacity, a graduate of a Hungarian-language institution, anyone aged sixty or over at the application, and anyone medically unable to sit it. Underneath sit a set of preferential routes that cut the eight years to three for a spouse of three years' standing, a parent of a Hungarian minor, an adoptee, a refugee or a stateless person, and to five for a person born here or resident since childhood. Two routes drop the residence requirement entirely: section 4(3) for a descendant or a person who makes their Hungarian origin plausible, and section 4(3a) for a spouse of ten years, or of five with a child in common. Both ask only for a clean record, no security objection and proof of Hungarian, and neither asks for the constitutional examination. Nothing in section 4 requires renouncing another citizenship and section 2(2) says a Hungarian who is simultaneously a citizen of another state is to be treated as Hungarian for the purposes of Hungarian law. What has changed is at the other end. Sections 9/A to 9/E now allow the designated minister, acting only of their own motion, to suspend for up to ten years the Hungarian citizenship of a dual national whose other citizenship is not that of an EEA state or an EU candidate state, where their conduct endangers public order, public security or national security and the suspension is proportionate. The Kuria reviews it in a five-judge panel within thirty days and may not vary the decision.
At a glance
- Ordinary residence requirement
- 8 continuous years before the application
Section 4(1)(a) of Act LV of 1993.
- Spouse of a Hungarian citizen
- 3 years of residence, after 3 years of marriage
Section 4(2)(a) of Act LV of 1993, which also covers a widowed spouse. Conditions (b) to (e) of section 4(1) still apply, the examination among them.
- Descendant or person of Hungarian origin
- No residence requirement at all
Section 4(3) of Act LV of 1993, applying only conditions (b) and (d) of section 4(1) and proof of Hungarian.
- Long marriage
- No residence requirement after 10 years of marriage, or 5 with a child in common
Section 4(3a) of Act LV of 1993, on the same two conditions plus proof of Hungarian.
- Language examination
- An examination in constitutional basic knowledge, taken in Hungarian
Section 4(1)(e) of Act LV of 1993. It is a test of constitutional knowledge rather than of language, but it is sat in Hungarian, so it is both.
- Exemption from the examination
- Age 60 at the application, Hungarian-language education, limited capacity, or medical incapacity
Section 4/A(2) of Act LV of 1993.
- Renouncing your other citizenship
- Not required by section 4 of Act LV of 1993, and section 2(2) treats a dual national as Hungarian
Nothing in the naturalisation conditions mentions renunciation, and the Act's own definition of who is a Hungarian citizen contemplates simultaneous foreign citizenship.
- Decision time
- 3 months for the minister's submission to the President, extendable by 3
Sections 17(2) and 17(4) of Act LV of 1993. No period is laid down for the President's own decision, and citizenship is acquired on the day the oath is taken under section 7(2).
- Suspension of citizenship
- Up to 10 years, for a dual national whose other citizenship is not EEA or EU-candidate
Sections 9/A(1)(b) and 9/C(2) of Act LV of 1993. Section 9/A(2) places an EU candidate state's citizenship on the same footing as an EEA one.
- Review of a suspension
- The Kuria, in a panel of five professional judges, within 30 days
Section 9/C(14) of Act LV of 1993, which also provides that the Kuria may not vary the minister's decision.
Requirements
- Eight years of continuous residence, or one of the preferential routes that shortens or removes it
- A clean Hungarian record, secured livelihood and housing, and no public or national security objection
- The constitutional basic knowledge examination in Hungarian - unless you are sixty, were schooled in Hungarian, or are on one of the two routes that do not require it
Country-level policy
Section 83(2)(b) of Act XC of 2023 makes the social coexistence conditions a condition of the national residence card, and section 87(4) extends the same requirement to the EU residence card, so both routes to settled status in Hungary pass through it. Section 80(1) of Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.) says what it means in practice: a Hungarian cultural knowledge examination. Section 81(6) provides that the examination is written and in Hungarian, which makes it a language requirement as well as a knowledge one although no provision read here sets a language level. The fee is 20,000 forints a sitting under section 80(4), payable before admission. Section 80(2) exempts only three classes - a person who has already passed it in another immigration procedure, a third-country national under 14, and one placed under guardianship by a final court judgment. The authority must announce at least four sittings a month and give fifteen working days' notice, and the result is pass or fail, announced on the spot. The provision with no counterpart elsewhere in this corpus is section 81(11): where an applicant finishes the examination with a fail three times, a further application to sit it must be refused. There is no waiting period and no second chance after it, and the refusal is of the application to sit rather than of the residence application. Section 79(2) exempts the national residence card issued in the national interest from the whole requirement.
Section 25(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 makes Magyar Kozlony the official journal of Hungary, published as an electronic document on the government portal, and provides that its text shall be regarded as authentic. Section 25(2) then provides that a consolidated text - a text of a statute incorporating its amended and repealed provisions - may not be published in Magyar Kozlony at all. The consolidated text lives instead in the Nemzeti Jogszabalytar, which section 29(1) of the same Act describes as an electronic collection of legislation operating as an electronic public service, free to anyone, providing a surface for publishing both the promulgated texts and the consolidated texts by time-state. Nothing in either instrument calls it authentic. Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) fills in the obligations: section 2(1) requires every statute in force to be published there in consolidated form with its past time-states back to 1 January 2010 and its next three; section 2(3) requires publication within three working days of promulgation. So the consolidation is a legal duty discharged on a statutory deadline by the state's own publisher, and it is still not the authentic text, because section 25(1) reserves that word for a journal that section 25(2) forbids from carrying a consolidation. The decree also carries a smaller discrepancy worth knowing: section 8(1) says the database operates on the www.njt.hu website, and the site that answers today is njt.jog.gov.hu.
What applies to you
Nothing changes for a citizen of Guatemala
We have no rule recorded that treats your citizenship differently here, so the general rule above is the one that applies to you. That is an answer, not a gap.
What the law says
«4. § (1) Kérelemére honosítható a nem magyar állampolgár, ha: a) a kérelem előterjesztését megelőző nyolc éven át folyamatosan Magyarországon lakott; b) a magyar jog szerint büntetlen előéletű és a kérelem elbírálásakor ellene magyar bíróság előtt büntetőeljárás nincs folyamatban; c)11 megélhetése és lakhatása Magyarországon biztosított; d)12 honosítása Magyarország közbiztonságát és nemzetbiztonságát nem sérti; e)13 igazolja, hogy alkotmányos alapismeretekből magyar nyelven eredményes vizsgát tett, vagy ez alól a törvény alapján mentesül és magyar nyelvtudását igazolja.»Our translation - not official
Section 4 (1) A non-Hungarian citizen may be naturalised on application if: a) they have lived continuously in Hungary for eight years before the submission of the application; b) they have a clean record under Hungarian law and no criminal proceedings are pending against them before a Hungarian court at the time the application is assessed; c) their livelihood and housing in Hungary are secured; d) their naturalisation does not harm the public security and national security of Hungary; e) they prove that they have passed an examination in constitutional basic knowledge in the Hungarian language, or are exempt from it under the Act and prove their knowledge of Hungarian.
The ordinary route. Point (e) is written as a single condition with an exemption folded into it, so a person exempt from the examination still has to prove the language.
Read it at the sourceAbout this source
The Hungarian state's own electronic collection of legislation, operated for the Minister of Justice by Magyar Kozlony Lap- es Konyvkiado Kft. under a public service contract, and the only place a consolidated Hungarian statute is published at all. Section 29(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 defines it; Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) sets the duties. Section 2(1) of the decree requires every statute in force to appear in consolidated form with all of its past time-states back to 1 January 2010 and its next three; section 2(3) requires the consolidation within three working days of promulgation. **Read the host carefully: section 8(1) of the decree still names www.njt.hu and the service that answers is njt.jog.gov.hu.** The address shape is njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-00-00 for an Act, using the Act's Roman numeral converted to Arabic - Act XC of 2023 is 2023-90-00-00, Act LV of 1993 is 1993-55-00-00, Act CXVII of 1995 is 1995-117-00-00 - and njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-20-22 for a government decree, so Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.) is 2024-35-20-22. The decisive thing on every page is the line under the title: Hatalyos: 2026. 10. 01. - 2026. 12. 31. By the definition of a time-state in section 1 of the decree, the closing date is the day before the text changes, so a page with a closing date is telling the reader that the law will be different on the day after it, and Nem ismert means no change is yet scheduled. Footnotes at the foot of the text name, for every amended paragraph, the Act or decree that put the current words there, which is the only machine-readable amendment history in the corpus.
Standing: Maintains the text in force
Cannot be cited for: **Nothing published here is the authentic text and Hungarian law says so in terms.** Section 25(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 confers authenticity on the Magyar Kozlony and section 25(2) forbids a consolidated text from being published in the Magyar Kozlony at all, so the authentic text and the current text are in two different places by design and the consolidation is never the authentic one. Neither Act CXXX of 2010 nor Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) uses the word hiteles of this database anywhere. The practical limitation that follows is narrower than it sounds and bites hard in one place: **an amending provision disappears from here once it has done its work.** Section 12(2) of Act CXXX of 2010 makes an amending provision lose force the day after it takes effect, and the consolidated text of the amending Act then prints only a footnote saying so, stripping the subtitle headings with it. Act XC of 2023 as served here therefore contains neither section 350 nor section 351, the two provisions that repealed the statute it replaced; Act LXXXIV of 2024 as served here contains neither section 135, which removed the 500,000 EUR property option from the guest investor programme, nor the subtitle that would say which commencement date applied to it. **For what was enacted, and for when, read the Magyar Kozlony issue.** It also cannot be cited for anything kept outside the statute book, and the 2023 immigration Act pushes a great deal out there: the government decree naming which nationalities may hold a guest worker permit or a National Card, the ministerial communication fixing the annual permit number under sections 28(4) and 30(4), the communication listing excluded occupations, the communication fixing the EU Blue Card salary under section 48(7) of Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.), and the registers of preferential employers and qualified temporary-work agencies. Nor is it the place to read a figure a statute re-indexes: section 25(3) of Act CXXX of 2019 prints a health service contribution of 7,710 forints set in 2020 and in the same breath provides that the rate in force is published each year by the National Tax and Customs Administration on its own website.
We re-read it every 60 days. More about this source
«Kérelmére kedvezményesen honosítható az a nem magyar állampolgár, aki a) legalább aa) tíz éve érvényes házasságban él olyan személlyel, aki az állampolgársági kérelem benyújtásának időpontjában magyar állampolgár, vagy ab) öt éve érvényes házasságban él olyan személlyel, aki az állampolgársági kérelem benyújtásának időpontjában magyar állampolgár, és közös gyermekük született, b) az (1) bekezdés b) és d) pontjában meghatározott feltételeknek megfelel, és c) magyar nyelvtudását igazolja.»Our translation - not official
A non-Hungarian citizen may be naturalised preferentially on application who a) has been living for at least aa) ten years in a valid marriage with a person who is a Hungarian citizen at the time the citizenship application is submitted, or ab) five years in a valid marriage with a person who is a Hungarian citizen at the time the citizenship application is submitted, and a child has been born to them in common, b) meets the conditions laid down in paragraph (1)(b) and (d), and c) proves their knowledge of Hungarian.
The marriage route that needs no residence. The three-year route in section 4(2)(a) does need it, and also the constitutional examination.
Read it at the sourceAbout this source
The Hungarian state's own electronic collection of legislation, operated for the Minister of Justice by Magyar Kozlony Lap- es Konyvkiado Kft. under a public service contract, and the only place a consolidated Hungarian statute is published at all. Section 29(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 defines it; Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) sets the duties. Section 2(1) of the decree requires every statute in force to appear in consolidated form with all of its past time-states back to 1 January 2010 and its next three; section 2(3) requires the consolidation within three working days of promulgation. **Read the host carefully: section 8(1) of the decree still names www.njt.hu and the service that answers is njt.jog.gov.hu.** The address shape is njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-00-00 for an Act, using the Act's Roman numeral converted to Arabic - Act XC of 2023 is 2023-90-00-00, Act LV of 1993 is 1993-55-00-00, Act CXVII of 1995 is 1995-117-00-00 - and njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-20-22 for a government decree, so Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.) is 2024-35-20-22. The decisive thing on every page is the line under the title: Hatalyos: 2026. 10. 01. - 2026. 12. 31. By the definition of a time-state in section 1 of the decree, the closing date is the day before the text changes, so a page with a closing date is telling the reader that the law will be different on the day after it, and Nem ismert means no change is yet scheduled. Footnotes at the foot of the text name, for every amended paragraph, the Act or decree that put the current words there, which is the only machine-readable amendment history in the corpus.
Standing: Maintains the text in force
Cannot be cited for: **Nothing published here is the authentic text and Hungarian law says so in terms.** Section 25(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 confers authenticity on the Magyar Kozlony and section 25(2) forbids a consolidated text from being published in the Magyar Kozlony at all, so the authentic text and the current text are in two different places by design and the consolidation is never the authentic one. Neither Act CXXX of 2010 nor Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) uses the word hiteles of this database anywhere. The practical limitation that follows is narrower than it sounds and bites hard in one place: **an amending provision disappears from here once it has done its work.** Section 12(2) of Act CXXX of 2010 makes an amending provision lose force the day after it takes effect, and the consolidated text of the amending Act then prints only a footnote saying so, stripping the subtitle headings with it. Act XC of 2023 as served here therefore contains neither section 350 nor section 351, the two provisions that repealed the statute it replaced; Act LXXXIV of 2024 as served here contains neither section 135, which removed the 500,000 EUR property option from the guest investor programme, nor the subtitle that would say which commencement date applied to it. **For what was enacted, and for when, read the Magyar Kozlony issue.** It also cannot be cited for anything kept outside the statute book, and the 2023 immigration Act pushes a great deal out there: the government decree naming which nationalities may hold a guest worker permit or a National Card, the ministerial communication fixing the annual permit number under sections 28(4) and 30(4), the communication listing excluded occupations, the communication fixing the EU Blue Card salary under section 48(7) of Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.), and the registers of preferential employers and qualified temporary-work agencies. Nor is it the place to read a figure a statute re-indexes: section 25(3) of Act CXXX of 2019 prints a health service contribution of 7,710 forints set in 2020 and in the same breath provides that the rate in force is published each year by the National Tax and Customs Administration on its own website.
We re-read it every 60 days. More about this source
«(2) Nem köteles vizsgát tenni: a)28 a korlátozottan cselekvőképes kiskorú és az a személy, akinek a cselekvőképességét a bíróság az állampolgársági eljárással kapcsolatos ügyek tekintetében korlátozta (a továbbiakban együtt: korlátozottan cselekvőképes személy), valamint a cselekvőképtelen személy; b)29 aki magyar tannyelvű nevelési-oktatási vagy felsőoktatási intézményben végzettséget szerzett; c)30 aki a kérelem benyújtásakor hatvanadik életévét betöltötte; d) aki igazolja, hogy egészségi állapotának tartós és visszafordíthatatlan romlása miatt képtelen a vizsga letételére.»Our translation - not official
(2) The following are not obliged to sit the examination: a) a minor of limited capacity and a person whose capacity has been limited by a court in respect of matters connected with citizenship proceedings (together: a person of limited capacity), and a person lacking capacity; b) a person who has obtained a qualification at a Hungarian-language educational or higher education institution; c) a person who has reached the age of sixty at the time the application is submitted; d) a person who proves that they are unable to sit the examination because of a lasting and irreversible deterioration of their state of health.
Four exemptions, and the age one is a bright line at sixty rather than a discretion.
Read it at the sourceAbout this source
The Hungarian state's own electronic collection of legislation, operated for the Minister of Justice by Magyar Kozlony Lap- es Konyvkiado Kft. under a public service contract, and the only place a consolidated Hungarian statute is published at all. Section 29(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 defines it; Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) sets the duties. Section 2(1) of the decree requires every statute in force to appear in consolidated form with all of its past time-states back to 1 January 2010 and its next three; section 2(3) requires the consolidation within three working days of promulgation. **Read the host carefully: section 8(1) of the decree still names www.njt.hu and the service that answers is njt.jog.gov.hu.** The address shape is njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-00-00 for an Act, using the Act's Roman numeral converted to Arabic - Act XC of 2023 is 2023-90-00-00, Act LV of 1993 is 1993-55-00-00, Act CXVII of 1995 is 1995-117-00-00 - and njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-20-22 for a government decree, so Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.) is 2024-35-20-22. The decisive thing on every page is the line under the title: Hatalyos: 2026. 10. 01. - 2026. 12. 31. By the definition of a time-state in section 1 of the decree, the closing date is the day before the text changes, so a page with a closing date is telling the reader that the law will be different on the day after it, and Nem ismert means no change is yet scheduled. Footnotes at the foot of the text name, for every amended paragraph, the Act or decree that put the current words there, which is the only machine-readable amendment history in the corpus.
Standing: Maintains the text in force
Cannot be cited for: **Nothing published here is the authentic text and Hungarian law says so in terms.** Section 25(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 confers authenticity on the Magyar Kozlony and section 25(2) forbids a consolidated text from being published in the Magyar Kozlony at all, so the authentic text and the current text are in two different places by design and the consolidation is never the authentic one. Neither Act CXXX of 2010 nor Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) uses the word hiteles of this database anywhere. The practical limitation that follows is narrower than it sounds and bites hard in one place: **an amending provision disappears from here once it has done its work.** Section 12(2) of Act CXXX of 2010 makes an amending provision lose force the day after it takes effect, and the consolidated text of the amending Act then prints only a footnote saying so, stripping the subtitle headings with it. Act XC of 2023 as served here therefore contains neither section 350 nor section 351, the two provisions that repealed the statute it replaced; Act LXXXIV of 2024 as served here contains neither section 135, which removed the 500,000 EUR property option from the guest investor programme, nor the subtitle that would say which commencement date applied to it. **For what was enacted, and for when, read the Magyar Kozlony issue.** It also cannot be cited for anything kept outside the statute book, and the 2023 immigration Act pushes a great deal out there: the government decree naming which nationalities may hold a guest worker permit or a National Card, the ministerial communication fixing the annual permit number under sections 28(4) and 30(4), the communication listing excluded occupations, the communication fixing the EU Blue Card salary under section 48(7) of Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.), and the registers of preferential employers and qualified temporary-work agencies. Nor is it the place to read a figure a statute re-indexes: section 25(3) of Act CXXX of 2019 prints a health service contribution of 7,710 forints set in 2020 and in the same breath provides that the rate in force is published each year by the National Tax and Customs Administration on its own website.
We re-read it every 60 days. More about this source
«Azt a magyar állampolgárt, aki egyidejűleg más államnak is állampolgára — ha törvény másként nem rendelkezik —, a magyar jog alkalmazása szempontjából magyar állampolgárnak kell tekinteni.»Our translation - not official
A Hungarian citizen who is simultaneously also a citizen of another state shall - unless an Act provides otherwise - be regarded as a Hungarian citizen for the purposes of applying Hungarian law.
Dual citizenship is contemplated by the Act rather than tolerated outside it, which is also why the suspension rules in sections 9/A to 9/E can be written to apply only to dual nationals.
Read it at the sourceAbout this source
The Hungarian state's own electronic collection of legislation, operated for the Minister of Justice by Magyar Kozlony Lap- es Konyvkiado Kft. under a public service contract, and the only place a consolidated Hungarian statute is published at all. Section 29(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 defines it; Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) sets the duties. Section 2(1) of the decree requires every statute in force to appear in consolidated form with all of its past time-states back to 1 January 2010 and its next three; section 2(3) requires the consolidation within three working days of promulgation. **Read the host carefully: section 8(1) of the decree still names www.njt.hu and the service that answers is njt.jog.gov.hu.** The address shape is njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-00-00 for an Act, using the Act's Roman numeral converted to Arabic - Act XC of 2023 is 2023-90-00-00, Act LV of 1993 is 1993-55-00-00, Act CXVII of 1995 is 1995-117-00-00 - and njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-20-22 for a government decree, so Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.) is 2024-35-20-22. The decisive thing on every page is the line under the title: Hatalyos: 2026. 10. 01. - 2026. 12. 31. By the definition of a time-state in section 1 of the decree, the closing date is the day before the text changes, so a page with a closing date is telling the reader that the law will be different on the day after it, and Nem ismert means no change is yet scheduled. Footnotes at the foot of the text name, for every amended paragraph, the Act or decree that put the current words there, which is the only machine-readable amendment history in the corpus.
Standing: Maintains the text in force
Cannot be cited for: **Nothing published here is the authentic text and Hungarian law says so in terms.** Section 25(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 confers authenticity on the Magyar Kozlony and section 25(2) forbids a consolidated text from being published in the Magyar Kozlony at all, so the authentic text and the current text are in two different places by design and the consolidation is never the authentic one. Neither Act CXXX of 2010 nor Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) uses the word hiteles of this database anywhere. The practical limitation that follows is narrower than it sounds and bites hard in one place: **an amending provision disappears from here once it has done its work.** Section 12(2) of Act CXXX of 2010 makes an amending provision lose force the day after it takes effect, and the consolidated text of the amending Act then prints only a footnote saying so, stripping the subtitle headings with it. Act XC of 2023 as served here therefore contains neither section 350 nor section 351, the two provisions that repealed the statute it replaced; Act LXXXIV of 2024 as served here contains neither section 135, which removed the 500,000 EUR property option from the guest investor programme, nor the subtitle that would say which commencement date applied to it. **For what was enacted, and for when, read the Magyar Kozlony issue.** It also cannot be cited for anything kept outside the statute book, and the 2023 immigration Act pushes a great deal out there: the government decree naming which nationalities may hold a guest worker permit or a National Card, the ministerial communication fixing the annual permit number under sections 28(4) and 30(4), the communication listing excluded occupations, the communication fixing the EU Blue Card salary under section 48(7) of Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.), and the registers of preferential employers and qualified temporary-work agencies. Nor is it the place to read a figure a statute re-indexes: section 25(3) of Act CXXX of 2019 prints a health service contribution of 7,710 forints set in 2020 and in the same breath provides that the rate in force is published each year by the National Tax and Customs Administration on its own website.
We re-read it every 60 days. More about this source
«9/B. § (1) A magyar állampolgársága felfüggeszthető annak a harmadik állam állampolgárságával is rendelkező magyar állampolgárnak, a) aki olyan magatartást tanúsít, amely veszélyt jelent Magyarország közrendjére, közbiztonságára vagy nemzetbiztonságára, és b) akinek esetében az állampolgárság felfüggesztése arányos intézkedésnek minősül a veszély súlyához és az érintett személy jogi, társadalmi helyzetéhez képest.»Our translation - not official
Section 9/B (1) The Hungarian citizenship of a Hungarian citizen who also holds the citizenship of a third state may be suspended where a) they engage in conduct that constitutes a danger to Hungary's public order, public security or national security, and b) suspension of citizenship is a proportionate measure in relation to the gravity of the danger and to the legal and social position of the person concerned.
A third state here means a state outside the EEA, and section 9/A(2) puts an EU candidate state on the same footing as an EEA one, so the measure reaches only those whose second passport is from outside that circle.
Read it at the sourceAbout this source
The Hungarian state's own electronic collection of legislation, operated for the Minister of Justice by Magyar Kozlony Lap- es Konyvkiado Kft. under a public service contract, and the only place a consolidated Hungarian statute is published at all. Section 29(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 defines it; Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) sets the duties. Section 2(1) of the decree requires every statute in force to appear in consolidated form with all of its past time-states back to 1 January 2010 and its next three; section 2(3) requires the consolidation within three working days of promulgation. **Read the host carefully: section 8(1) of the decree still names www.njt.hu and the service that answers is njt.jog.gov.hu.** The address shape is njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-00-00 for an Act, using the Act's Roman numeral converted to Arabic - Act XC of 2023 is 2023-90-00-00, Act LV of 1993 is 1993-55-00-00, Act CXVII of 1995 is 1995-117-00-00 - and njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-20-22 for a government decree, so Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.) is 2024-35-20-22. The decisive thing on every page is the line under the title: Hatalyos: 2026. 10. 01. - 2026. 12. 31. By the definition of a time-state in section 1 of the decree, the closing date is the day before the text changes, so a page with a closing date is telling the reader that the law will be different on the day after it, and Nem ismert means no change is yet scheduled. Footnotes at the foot of the text name, for every amended paragraph, the Act or decree that put the current words there, which is the only machine-readable amendment history in the corpus.
Standing: Maintains the text in force
Cannot be cited for: **Nothing published here is the authentic text and Hungarian law says so in terms.** Section 25(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 confers authenticity on the Magyar Kozlony and section 25(2) forbids a consolidated text from being published in the Magyar Kozlony at all, so the authentic text and the current text are in two different places by design and the consolidation is never the authentic one. Neither Act CXXX of 2010 nor Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) uses the word hiteles of this database anywhere. The practical limitation that follows is narrower than it sounds and bites hard in one place: **an amending provision disappears from here once it has done its work.** Section 12(2) of Act CXXX of 2010 makes an amending provision lose force the day after it takes effect, and the consolidated text of the amending Act then prints only a footnote saying so, stripping the subtitle headings with it. Act XC of 2023 as served here therefore contains neither section 350 nor section 351, the two provisions that repealed the statute it replaced; Act LXXXIV of 2024 as served here contains neither section 135, which removed the 500,000 EUR property option from the guest investor programme, nor the subtitle that would say which commencement date applied to it. **For what was enacted, and for when, read the Magyar Kozlony issue.** It also cannot be cited for anything kept outside the statute book, and the 2023 immigration Act pushes a great deal out there: the government decree naming which nationalities may hold a guest worker permit or a National Card, the ministerial communication fixing the annual permit number under sections 28(4) and 30(4), the communication listing excluded occupations, the communication fixing the EU Blue Card salary under section 48(7) of Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.), and the registers of preferential employers and qualified temporary-work agencies. Nor is it the place to read a figure a statute re-indexes: section 25(3) of Act CXXX of 2019 prints a health service contribution of 7,710 forints set in 2020 and in the same breath provides that the rate in force is published each year by the National Tax and Customs Administration on its own website.
We re-read it every 60 days. More about this source
«(2) A felfüggesztés időtartama legfeljebb tíz év. A felfüggesztés időtartamának meghatározása során a kijelölt miniszter a 9/B. § szerinti mérlegelési szempontokat veszi figyelembe. (3) A magyar állampolgárság felfüggesztését megalapozó okkal érintett személlyel összefüggésben bárki bejelentést tehet, de a kijelölt miniszter e § szerinti eljárásának kizárólag hivatalból van helye. A bejelentő nem minősül ügyfélnek.»Our translation - not official
(2) The duration of the suspension is at most ten years. In determining the duration of the suspension the designated minister takes into account the considerations under section 9/B. (3) Anyone may make a report in connection with a person affected by a ground for suspending Hungarian citizenship, but the designated minister's procedure under this section may be commenced only of the minister's own motion. The person making the report is not a party.
Anyone may report, nobody may apply, and the person who reports has no standing in what follows.
Read it at the sourceAbout this source
The Hungarian state's own electronic collection of legislation, operated for the Minister of Justice by Magyar Kozlony Lap- es Konyvkiado Kft. under a public service contract, and the only place a consolidated Hungarian statute is published at all. Section 29(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 defines it; Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) sets the duties. Section 2(1) of the decree requires every statute in force to appear in consolidated form with all of its past time-states back to 1 January 2010 and its next three; section 2(3) requires the consolidation within three working days of promulgation. **Read the host carefully: section 8(1) of the decree still names www.njt.hu and the service that answers is njt.jog.gov.hu.** The address shape is njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-00-00 for an Act, using the Act's Roman numeral converted to Arabic - Act XC of 2023 is 2023-90-00-00, Act LV of 1993 is 1993-55-00-00, Act CXVII of 1995 is 1995-117-00-00 - and njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-20-22 for a government decree, so Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.) is 2024-35-20-22. The decisive thing on every page is the line under the title: Hatalyos: 2026. 10. 01. - 2026. 12. 31. By the definition of a time-state in section 1 of the decree, the closing date is the day before the text changes, so a page with a closing date is telling the reader that the law will be different on the day after it, and Nem ismert means no change is yet scheduled. Footnotes at the foot of the text name, for every amended paragraph, the Act or decree that put the current words there, which is the only machine-readable amendment history in the corpus.
Standing: Maintains the text in force
Cannot be cited for: **Nothing published here is the authentic text and Hungarian law says so in terms.** Section 25(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 confers authenticity on the Magyar Kozlony and section 25(2) forbids a consolidated text from being published in the Magyar Kozlony at all, so the authentic text and the current text are in two different places by design and the consolidation is never the authentic one. Neither Act CXXX of 2010 nor Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) uses the word hiteles of this database anywhere. The practical limitation that follows is narrower than it sounds and bites hard in one place: **an amending provision disappears from here once it has done its work.** Section 12(2) of Act CXXX of 2010 makes an amending provision lose force the day after it takes effect, and the consolidated text of the amending Act then prints only a footnote saying so, stripping the subtitle headings with it. Act XC of 2023 as served here therefore contains neither section 350 nor section 351, the two provisions that repealed the statute it replaced; Act LXXXIV of 2024 as served here contains neither section 135, which removed the 500,000 EUR property option from the guest investor programme, nor the subtitle that would say which commencement date applied to it. **For what was enacted, and for when, read the Magyar Kozlony issue.** It also cannot be cited for anything kept outside the statute book, and the 2023 immigration Act pushes a great deal out there: the government decree naming which nationalities may hold a guest worker permit or a National Card, the ministerial communication fixing the annual permit number under sections 28(4) and 30(4), the communication listing excluded occupations, the communication fixing the EU Blue Card salary under section 48(7) of Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.), and the registers of preferential employers and qualified temporary-work agencies. Nor is it the place to read a figure a statute re-indexes: section 25(3) of Act CXXX of 2019 prints a health service contribution of 7,710 forints set in 2020 and in the same breath provides that the rate in force is published each year by the National Tax and Customs Administration on its own website.
We re-read it every 60 days. More about this source
«A miniszter a 6\. § (1) bekezdésében foglalt előterjesztést három hónapon belül nyújtja be a köztársasági elnöknek.»Our translation - not official
The minister shall submit the proposal referred to in section 6(1) to the President of the Republic within three months.
The only deadline on the way to a decision. Section 17(4) allows it to be extended by three months and nothing sets a period for the President.
Read it at the sourceAbout this source
The Hungarian state's own electronic collection of legislation, operated for the Minister of Justice by Magyar Kozlony Lap- es Konyvkiado Kft. under a public service contract, and the only place a consolidated Hungarian statute is published at all. Section 29(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 defines it; Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) sets the duties. Section 2(1) of the decree requires every statute in force to appear in consolidated form with all of its past time-states back to 1 January 2010 and its next three; section 2(3) requires the consolidation within three working days of promulgation. **Read the host carefully: section 8(1) of the decree still names www.njt.hu and the service that answers is njt.jog.gov.hu.** The address shape is njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-00-00 for an Act, using the Act's Roman numeral converted to Arabic - Act XC of 2023 is 2023-90-00-00, Act LV of 1993 is 1993-55-00-00, Act CXVII of 1995 is 1995-117-00-00 - and njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-20-22 for a government decree, so Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.) is 2024-35-20-22. The decisive thing on every page is the line under the title: Hatalyos: 2026. 10. 01. - 2026. 12. 31. By the definition of a time-state in section 1 of the decree, the closing date is the day before the text changes, so a page with a closing date is telling the reader that the law will be different on the day after it, and Nem ismert means no change is yet scheduled. Footnotes at the foot of the text name, for every amended paragraph, the Act or decree that put the current words there, which is the only machine-readable amendment history in the corpus.
Standing: Maintains the text in force
Cannot be cited for: **Nothing published here is the authentic text and Hungarian law says so in terms.** Section 25(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 confers authenticity on the Magyar Kozlony and section 25(2) forbids a consolidated text from being published in the Magyar Kozlony at all, so the authentic text and the current text are in two different places by design and the consolidation is never the authentic one. Neither Act CXXX of 2010 nor Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) uses the word hiteles of this database anywhere. The practical limitation that follows is narrower than it sounds and bites hard in one place: **an amending provision disappears from here once it has done its work.** Section 12(2) of Act CXXX of 2010 makes an amending provision lose force the day after it takes effect, and the consolidated text of the amending Act then prints only a footnote saying so, stripping the subtitle headings with it. Act XC of 2023 as served here therefore contains neither section 350 nor section 351, the two provisions that repealed the statute it replaced; Act LXXXIV of 2024 as served here contains neither section 135, which removed the 500,000 EUR property option from the guest investor programme, nor the subtitle that would say which commencement date applied to it. **For what was enacted, and for when, read the Magyar Kozlony issue.** It also cannot be cited for anything kept outside the statute book, and the 2023 immigration Act pushes a great deal out there: the government decree naming which nationalities may hold a guest worker permit or a National Card, the ministerial communication fixing the annual permit number under sections 28(4) and 30(4), the communication listing excluded occupations, the communication fixing the EU Blue Card salary under section 48(7) of Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.), and the registers of preferential employers and qualified temporary-work agencies. Nor is it the place to read a figure a statute re-indexes: section 25(3) of Act CXXX of 2019 prints a health service contribution of 7,710 forints set in 2020 and in the same breath provides that the rate in force is published each year by the National Tax and Customs Administration on its own website.
We re-read it every 60 days. More about this source
Practical notes
The language requirement is two different things depending on the route. On the ordinary route it is an examination in constitutional basic knowledge sat in Hungarian; on the descent and long-marriage routes it is proof of knowledge of Hungarian, which section 2(1) of Government Decree No 125/1993. (IX. 22.) has the official taking the application check at the counter.
The suspension rules were read in the consolidated text in force from 1 October 2026. The amending instrument that inserted them was not read, so no commencement date for them is stated here.
Section 9/D allows a suspended citizen to apply once, during the suspension, to have the citizenship restored on proof that restoring it would be no danger, and section 9/E restores it automatically where the person would otherwise become stateless or where the period runs out.
- consolidates1993. évi LV. törvény a magyar állampolgárságról
Nemzeti Jogszabalytar, Igazsagugyi Miniszterium · consolidated to 2026-10-01
About this source
The Hungarian state's own electronic collection of legislation, operated for the Minister of Justice by Magyar Kozlony Lap- es Konyvkiado Kft. under a public service contract, and the only place a consolidated Hungarian statute is published at all. Section 29(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 defines it; Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) sets the duties. Section 2(1) of the decree requires every statute in force to appear in consolidated form with all of its past time-states back to 1 January 2010 and its next three; section 2(3) requires the consolidation within three working days of promulgation. **Read the host carefully: section 8(1) of the decree still names www.njt.hu and the service that answers is njt.jog.gov.hu.** The address shape is njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-00-00 for an Act, using the Act's Roman numeral converted to Arabic - Act XC of 2023 is 2023-90-00-00, Act LV of 1993 is 1993-55-00-00, Act CXVII of 1995 is 1995-117-00-00 - and njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-20-22 for a government decree, so Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.) is 2024-35-20-22. The decisive thing on every page is the line under the title: Hatalyos: 2026. 10. 01. - 2026. 12. 31. By the definition of a time-state in section 1 of the decree, the closing date is the day before the text changes, so a page with a closing date is telling the reader that the law will be different on the day after it, and Nem ismert means no change is yet scheduled. Footnotes at the foot of the text name, for every amended paragraph, the Act or decree that put the current words there, which is the only machine-readable amendment history in the corpus.
Standing: Maintains the text in force
Cannot be cited for: **Nothing published here is the authentic text and Hungarian law says so in terms.** Section 25(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 confers authenticity on the Magyar Kozlony and section 25(2) forbids a consolidated text from being published in the Magyar Kozlony at all, so the authentic text and the current text are in two different places by design and the consolidation is never the authentic one. Neither Act CXXX of 2010 nor Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) uses the word hiteles of this database anywhere. The practical limitation that follows is narrower than it sounds and bites hard in one place: **an amending provision disappears from here once it has done its work.** Section 12(2) of Act CXXX of 2010 makes an amending provision lose force the day after it takes effect, and the consolidated text of the amending Act then prints only a footnote saying so, stripping the subtitle headings with it. Act XC of 2023 as served here therefore contains neither section 350 nor section 351, the two provisions that repealed the statute it replaced; Act LXXXIV of 2024 as served here contains neither section 135, which removed the 500,000 EUR property option from the guest investor programme, nor the subtitle that would say which commencement date applied to it. **For what was enacted, and for when, read the Magyar Kozlony issue.** It also cannot be cited for anything kept outside the statute book, and the 2023 immigration Act pushes a great deal out there: the government decree naming which nationalities may hold a guest worker permit or a National Card, the ministerial communication fixing the annual permit number under sections 28(4) and 30(4), the communication listing excluded occupations, the communication fixing the EU Blue Card salary under section 48(7) of Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.), and the registers of preferential employers and qualified temporary-work agencies. Nor is it the place to read a figure a statute re-indexes: section 25(3) of Act CXXX of 2019 prints a health service contribution of 7,710 forints set in 2020 and in the same breath provides that the rate in force is published each year by the National Tax and Customs Administration on its own website.
We re-read it every 60 days. More about this source
- consolidates125/1993. (IX. 22.) Korm. rendelet a magyar állampolgárságról szóló 1993. évi LV. törvény végrehajtásáról
Nemzeti Jogszabalytar, Igazsagugyi Miniszterium · consolidated to 2025-07-01
About this source
The Hungarian state's own electronic collection of legislation, operated for the Minister of Justice by Magyar Kozlony Lap- es Konyvkiado Kft. under a public service contract, and the only place a consolidated Hungarian statute is published at all. Section 29(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 defines it; Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) sets the duties. Section 2(1) of the decree requires every statute in force to appear in consolidated form with all of its past time-states back to 1 January 2010 and its next three; section 2(3) requires the consolidation within three working days of promulgation. **Read the host carefully: section 8(1) of the decree still names www.njt.hu and the service that answers is njt.jog.gov.hu.** The address shape is njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-00-00 for an Act, using the Act's Roman numeral converted to Arabic - Act XC of 2023 is 2023-90-00-00, Act LV of 1993 is 1993-55-00-00, Act CXVII of 1995 is 1995-117-00-00 - and njt.jog.gov.hu/jogszabaly/{YEAR}-{NUMBER}-20-22 for a government decree, so Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.) is 2024-35-20-22. The decisive thing on every page is the line under the title: Hatalyos: 2026. 10. 01. - 2026. 12. 31. By the definition of a time-state in section 1 of the decree, the closing date is the day before the text changes, so a page with a closing date is telling the reader that the law will be different on the day after it, and Nem ismert means no change is yet scheduled. Footnotes at the foot of the text name, for every amended paragraph, the Act or decree that put the current words there, which is the only machine-readable amendment history in the corpus.
Standing: Maintains the text in force
Cannot be cited for: **Nothing published here is the authentic text and Hungarian law says so in terms.** Section 25(1) of Act CXXX of 2010 confers authenticity on the Magyar Kozlony and section 25(2) forbids a consolidated text from being published in the Magyar Kozlony at all, so the authentic text and the current text are in two different places by design and the consolidation is never the authentic one. Neither Act CXXX of 2010 nor Government Decree No 338/2011. (XII. 29.) uses the word hiteles of this database anywhere. The practical limitation that follows is narrower than it sounds and bites hard in one place: **an amending provision disappears from here once it has done its work.** Section 12(2) of Act CXXX of 2010 makes an amending provision lose force the day after it takes effect, and the consolidated text of the amending Act then prints only a footnote saying so, stripping the subtitle headings with it. Act XC of 2023 as served here therefore contains neither section 350 nor section 351, the two provisions that repealed the statute it replaced; Act LXXXIV of 2024 as served here contains neither section 135, which removed the 500,000 EUR property option from the guest investor programme, nor the subtitle that would say which commencement date applied to it. **For what was enacted, and for when, read the Magyar Kozlony issue.** It also cannot be cited for anything kept outside the statute book, and the 2023 immigration Act pushes a great deal out there: the government decree naming which nationalities may hold a guest worker permit or a National Card, the ministerial communication fixing the annual permit number under sections 28(4) and 30(4), the communication listing excluded occupations, the communication fixing the EU Blue Card salary under section 48(7) of Government Decree No 35/2024. (II. 29.), and the registers of preferential employers and qualified temporary-work agencies. Nor is it the place to read a figure a statute re-indexes: section 25(3) of Act CXXX of 2019 prints a health service contribution of 7,710 forints set in 2020 and in the same breath provides that the rate in force is published each year by the National Tax and Customs Administration on its own website.
We re-read it every 60 days. More about this source